The Centre for Criminology has a well-established interest in youth justice research. There is particular emphasis on how research findings can be applied to policy and practice in such areas as desistance, diversion, children’s rights, restorative justice and homelessness.
The Centre also has a long history of research on the probation service and custodial institutions, and related topics such as the rehabilitation and resettlement of offenders, effectiveness and accountability in policy and practice, inter-agency partnerships and relationships between the criminal justice system, the Third Sector and the UK and Welsh governments.
Staff enjoy close working relationships with policy makers, managers and practitioners in the fields of probation, youth justice and custodial services. Members work closely with colleagues in the Substance Use Research Group, with whom they organise the Lessons from the Lockdown series.
This project, funded by the Leverhulme Trust, was conducted by Professors Kate Williams and Mike Maguire in partnership with Dr Mary Corcoran, Keele University. The main aim was to understand how changes in government policy, funding structures, monitoring and evaluation, partnerships and collaborations, and service user needs, have affected the work, culture and relationships of voluntary organisations providing services in the criminal justice and penal field. The research entailed over 200 interviews with people working in the voluntary sector, policy makers, commissioners and strategic decision makers in the criminal justice field. Publications emerging from the research include:
Professor Jonathan Evans and Dr John Deering conducted an empirical studies into the introduction of new ways of working and occupational and professional working cultures within youth offending services.
This project was conducted within a youth offending service in South-East Wales and looked at staff responses to the introduction of AssetPlus, a document intended to promote desistance-informed practice.
Given that youth offending services are now expected by government to develop practice underpinned by desistance theory, the study considers how this and AssetPlus had been received and translated into practice, basing this on the often-unheard views of practitioners and operational managers.
The researchers concluded that AssetPlus was not widely welcomed as a practice tool, but that practitioners were likely to be more receptive to desistance-based practice.
The conclusion that this practice might be based upon work with and on behalf children and young people in conflict with the law by promoting: ‘human capital and a more pro-social identity, via motivational work’ and ‘social capital, via advocacy and brokerage’, all facilitated by an empathic professional relationship.
Professor Jonathan Evans and Dr John Deering conducted an online study with practitioners and managers in youth offending services in England and Wales. The aims were to investigate the ‘current state’ of occupational and professional cultures in youth offending services.
The questionnaire explored the views of staff on a range of topics related to their work. Working with children and young people who are on the verge of entering the youth justice system, or have already done so, has undergone significant change in recent decades and we were interested in the views of workers about these changes and the impact they may have had upon their beliefs and values related to their work. The questionnaire asked about why individuals became youth offending service workers, their professional values and ethics, experiences of working in the sector and related issues. Data from the study are currently being analysed with a view to submitting an article to a journal in due course.
Dr Harriet Pierpoint has undertaken a research project funded by Welsh Government: Evaluation of Homelessness Services provided to Young People leaving the Secure Estate, Language and Communication Needs Research Project for Young People from Wales in the Youth Justice System
The report considers how local authorities, Youth Offending Teams, secure establishments and the third sector understand and implement the processes set out in the Pathway, and the challenges they face. It also looks at the experiences of the young people who come into contact with the Pathway. Generally, the Pathway is being implemented as envisaged and the main impact has been the development of closer relationships between partners. However, there are some challenges and areas for improvement.
Pierpoint has been invited to present her research on homelessness services for young people leaving the secure estate at key national and international conferences including for Cymorth Cymru, the umbrella body for providers of homelessness, housing related support and social care services in Wales; the British Society of Criminology and the American Society of Criminology, and at the Wales Housing Research Conference.
Dr Palash Kamruzzaman, Professor Kate Williams and Professor Ali Wardak are leading a multi-country project, which focuses on the forcibly displaced Rohingyas living in Bangladesh and internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Afghanistan. The study is funded by the British Academy.
The research offers an in-depth and nuanced understanding of some of the world’s poorest, most excluded and victimised groups of people. The Rohingyas and IDPs constitute two of the largest displaced populations in the world, with almost 1million Rohingyas living in Bangladeshi camps and almost 3million IDPs in Afghanistan.
Existing approaches to dignity ignore the experience and perception of dignity (and loss of it) from the perspective of victim groups. Many traditional approaches impose the view and perspective of the powerful over the experience of the vulnerable, denying their voice and negating them any power or control.
This study adopts a bottom-up approach in understanding and revisiting existing conceptualisations of dignity through the lens of affected, vulnerable and victimised people.
In-depth interviews, observations and surveys were conducted in Kutupalong refugee camps in Ukhia, Bangladesh. In Afghanistan, the research team has collected data from displaced people living in eight provinces. They have also interviewed humanitarian actors and high-level government officials working in each of the countries.
The study will inform national, regional and international policymakers, allowing them to become conscious of dignity from the perspective of the displaced people.
Aimed at maintaining contact and improving relationships between prisoners and their children and families, this incorporated a ‘family wing’ whose residents undertook numerous parenting-related courses and interventions; radically reformed, family-friendly visiting arrangements and environment, managed by Barnardo’s staff; and ‘through the gate’ Family Intervention Mentors employed to work with prisoners and their families before and after release.
The overall conclusion was that the Invisible Wall Wales intervention had had a substantial positive impact upon its participants’ lives. There was strong evidence of enhanced quality of family life and community inclusion; improvements in accommodation and employment, and reductions in substance misuse, among both ex-prisoners and adult family members; and improvements in children’s emotional well-being, attention levels, behaviour and peer relationships.
Clancy, A. and Maguire, M. (2018) Prisoners’ Children and Families: Can the Walls be Invisible? Research Report. Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice. Published online.
Clancy, A. and Maguire, M. (2017) Prisoners and their children: an innovative model of ‘whole family’ support. European Journal of Probation, Vol 9, 3: 210-30.
Clancy, A. and Maguire, M. (2020) ‘”He is a new man, a proper family man”: The impact of a specialist family wing on the quality of family relationships and paternal identity among imprisoned fathers.’ Howard Journal
Dr Harriet Pierpoint is interested in vulnerability and fairness in the criminal justice system. Her work focusses on vulnerable people in the criminal justice system, including young suspects, adult offenders with speech, language and communication needs, prison leavers and ex-offenders facing or experiencing homelessness. One body of her work relates to the age of criminal responsibility (ACR).
The age of criminal responsibility (ACR) is the minimum age that a child can be prosecuted and punished by law for an offence and is 10 years in England and Wales. There are frequent calls to raise it from the United Nations (UN), professional bodies and academics, as well as legal attempts.
She has argued, drawing on criminological, sociological, psychological, legal and neuroscientific perspectives, that the ACR should be raised from 10 to 14 years in England and Wales. Alternatively, she argues, that if the ACR is to be retained at 10, then the prosecution should be required to demonstrate that a child under 14 knew what they were doing was seriously wrong (as opposed to simple mischief). Given the appeals to increase the ACR, the uncertainty around current public opinion (with the last British survey in 2010) and its recent increase to 12 years in Scotland, it is timely to examine the appropriateness of the ACR in England and Wales.
Dr Pierpoint was invited to participate in the British Academy’s ongoing Childhood and the State project exploring the changing role of the state in the lives of British children over the past four decades. This project seeks to re-frame debates around childhood in both the public and policy realms, and move beyond academic, policy and professional silos and towards a new conceptualisation of children in policymaking, drawing on and contributing to developments in all four nations.
Dr Harriet Pierpoint was commissioned by the British Academy to write a provocation paper on the age of criminal responsibility and attend two workshops for a select group of academics and senior policymakers.
The purpose of the paper is to explain what is meant by the ACR, to explain the position in England and Wales, and beyond, and then to take a multi-disciplinary approach to debating whether the ACR in England and Wales is appropriate — by drawing on criminological, sociological, psychological, legal and neuroscientific perspectives.
She will be speaking at the British Academy’s discussion event on youth justice later in 2020, has been commissioned to write a further article on the ACR for The Conversation and has received ethical approval for an online survey on public opinion on the ACR.
Professor Jonathan Evans, University of South Wales (Lead author)
Reviewers include Dusty Kennedy, visiting fellow; and Brian Heath, MBE, visiting fellow.
The Jersey Youth Justice Review examines the way in which Jersey's justice system deals with children. It was commissioned by the Government in Jersey in response to a recommendation from the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry.
It finds good practice and best intentions throughout the criminal justice system, but also many areas that could be improved. It makes a significant number of recommendations that have been accepted in principle by the Council of Ministers.
The report proposes a model in which 'children are put first' and where, even if young people have done wrong, the criminal justice system recognises that they are, first and foremost, children.
Dr Robert Jones was seconded to the Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University for two years to carry out research into criminal justice and devolution in Wales. The Justice and Jurisdiction project brought together an interdisciplinary group of academic researchers consisting of political scientists, criminologists, constitutional law experts and political economists to investigate the operation of the legal and justice system in Wales. The project was funded by a combination of the Economic and Social Research Council, the Welsh Government and Cardiff University.
As well as producing high quality academic outputs, the project generated a series of reports intended to inform the work of Commission on Justice in Wales as well as encourage an informed public debate on the organisation and operation of the legal and justice system in Wales. Dr Jones’ research findings on imprisonment in Wales featured within parliamentary debates at the Welsh Senedd and contributed to separate inquiries at the House of Commons and the Welsh Parliament. Some of the main outputs from the project are listed below and can be accessed by clicking here.
Jones, R. (2020) Prisons, Probation and Sentencing in Wales: 2019 Factfile. September 2020. Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University.
Jones, R. (2020) ‘Criminology and Criminal Justice in Post-Devolution Wales’. European Journal of Criminology. 0 (0): 1-19.
Jones, R. (2020) Covid-19 and Imprisonment in Wales. April 2020. Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University.
Jones, R. (2019) Sentencing and Imprisonment in Wales: 2018 Factfile. August 2019 Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre.
Jones, R., Wyn Jones, R., Pritchard, H. and Nicholas, L. (2019) International evidence on driving down imprisonment rates: What Wales could be? May 2019. Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre.
Jones, R. and Wyn Jones, R. (2019) Justice at the jagged edge in Wales. March 2019. Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre.
Jones, R. (2019) Sentencing and Immediate Custody in Wales. January 2019. Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre.
Jones, R. (2018) Imprisonment in Wales: A Breakdown by Local Authority. August 2018. Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre.
Jones, R. (2018) Imprisonment in Wales: A Factfile. June 2018. Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre.
Dr Cheryl Allsop, obtained her ESRC funded PhD, which focused on how the police seek to solve long term unsolved murders and stranger rapes, from Cardiff University.
Her book Cold Case Reviews: DNA, Detective Work and Unsolved Major Crimes, published by Oxford University Press in 2018, is based on this ethnographic research.
She also has a degree in Law from Nottingham Trent University, a degree in Psychology from the Open University and a Master’s degree in Criminal Justice Studies from Portsmouth University, which she studied for part time while working full time in a variety of roles for a FTSE 100 financial services organisation. She also has a master’s degree in Social Science Research Methods, socio-legal pathway, from Cardiff University.
Cheryl is currently a senior lecturer in criminology and is a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy. She is also the Deputy Director and Training Lead of the Doctoral Training Alliance (DTA) for social policy.
In line with her research and teaching interests Cheryl is on the board of Locate International, a charity set up to work with the families of long-term missing people.
She established the University of South Wales cold case unit, leading a team of students and community volunteers and experts reviewing unsolved missing people cases, on behalf of the families, in conjunction with Locate International.
Her current research is focused on missing people investigations, especially vulnerable missing people, no-body murders and unidentified found remains.
Dr Allsop is a member of the BSC Vulnerability Research Network and the lead for the vulnerable victims theme.
Dr John Deering, Associate Professor of Criminology, was a probation officer before entering higher education. His areas of interest are the theory and practice of the criminal justice system, in particular the probation service and the youth justice system.
Professor Mike Maguire has a long-standing interest in the rehabilitation and resettlement of offenders and the organizations which work with them.
His primary focus has been upon prisoner resettlement (or ‘re-entry’). He has conducted numerous research projects examining conceptual, policy and practice issues both in the statutory post-release supervision of ex-prisoners by probation services, and in the role of other public, voluntary and private agencies. This interest goes back to the early 1990s, when he undertook critical analysis of the new system of ‘automatic conditional release’ (which replaced discretionary parole for most prisoners) and the demise of ‘voluntary aftercare’.
He has since explored a variety of new approaches to resettlement, including the use of ‘through the gate’ mentors, and moves away from ‘silo’ services towards more ‘holistic’, partnership-based work.
More recently, he has looked at tensions between welfare and criminal justice goals; at the impact of major changes in probation services, competitive commissioning, and greater involvement by the third and private sectors; and at innovative ways of improving service provision in specific fields such as housing, substance misuse, mental health, employment, and family work.
Dr Harriet Pierpoint is Associate Professor of Criminology at the Centre for Criminology at University of South Wales. She is interested in vulnerability and fairness in the criminal justice system. Her work focusses on vulnerable people in the criminal justice system, including young suspects, adult offenders with speech, language and communication needs, prison leavers and ex-offenders facing or experiencing homelessness. Her interest in vulnerability also extends to the abuse of animals. She has expertise in quantitative and qualitative research methods, and a particular interest in research ethics.
She has undertaken and managed funded research projects for the Youth Justice Board, Home Office, Ministry of Justice, National Offender Management Service Cymru, Welsh Government and St Giles Trust and has published in internationally recognised, peer reviewed journals, such as ‘Policing and Society: An International Journal’ and ‘Criminology and Criminal Justice: The International Journal’. She is a co-editor of the Handbook on Crime for Willan Publishing, and of the new International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies for Palgrave Macmillan. Her work on ‘appropriate adults’ and vulnerable suspects is cited in the National Appropriate Adult Network National Standards Review 2018.
Harriet presents her research at key national and international conferences and has been by invited by academics and practitioners to give guest lectures.
She is a member of Editorial Advisory Board of the ‘Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies’. She is Co-Chair of the British Society of Criminology Vulnerability Research Network and of the South Wales Police Independent Ethics Committee. She was selected as a participant on the Welsh Crucible 2017.
Professor Ali Wardak played a central role in founding the BSc Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Wales.
His main research interests focus on comparative crime and justice, criminological theory and the relationships between state and non-state justice systems.
From 2006 to 2008, Professor Wardak worked for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Kabul, and co-authored the 2007 Afghanistan Human Development Report where a ‘hybrid model’ for post-Taliban justice system in Afghanistan is proposed.
Professor Wardak has collaborated closely with Professor John Braithwaite on Peacebuilding Compared research project that focuses on a study of ‘what works in peace building’ and on the causes of conflicts in 48 countries around the world Peace Building Compared.
He is a Vice President of the South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology, and has been an invited speaker to major conferences/forums in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and the United States.
Professor Kate Williams is Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Wales. She is also Director of the Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice, a HEFCW funded initiative which brings together researchers across eight Welsh universities and builds links with both policy and practice.
Over more than 30 years, she has undertaken and managed numerous empirical research projects and has published on a wide range of crime and justice related topics, including youth justice, female offending, CCTV, victims, crime reduction, risk management, human rights and social justice.
Recent research has revolved around the criminal justice service in rural areas (particularly the Youth Justice Service and the Police) and the treatment of women and young people who offend (evaluation of initiatives for diverting women and young people out of the official criminal justice system) and an evaluation of the motivations and explanations behind prolific young offenders.
Kate also acts as an advisor to the Youth Justice Board Cymru’s Practice Development Panel (Hwb Doeth), she co-chairs Domestic Homicide Reviews in two local authority areas in Wales, sits on the Welsh Government’s Safer Communities Programme, and has provided advice to the Welsh Government on subjects such as substance misuse.
Professor Jonathan Evans is Professor of Youth Justice Policy and Practice.
His research, publications and teaching are mainly in the areas of youth justice, children’s human rights, public care, social work practice and youth policy. He is also a member of both the Wales Youth Justice Advisory Panel and Hwb Doeth.
Jonathan has worked in the field of youth policy as a rapporteur and senior consultant with the Council of Europe. Between 2006 and 2010 he was one of the United Kingdom’s representatives on the European Youth Research Network (Council of Europe and European Commission Partnership). From 2012 until 2017 he was a Welsh Labour and Co-operative Party Councillor on Cardiff County Council where he was Chair of the Corporate Parenting Panel, Vice-Chair of the Corporate Parenting Advisory Committee and a Member of the Children and Young People’s Scrutiny Committee.
Dr Robert Jones is a Lecturer in Criminology at the University of South Wales and is a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy.
His main research interests focus on devolution and imprisonment in Wales. In 2018 he was seconded to the Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University to carry out research as part of its Justice and Jurisdiction project. The study resulted in a number of publications which were extensively cited in the final report of the Commission on Justice in Wales. Rob was included amongst a list of Expert Contributors in the Commission’s final report.
His recent research on imprisonment in Wales has featured within parliamentary debates at the Welsh Senedd and he has contributed both written and oral evidence to separate inquiries at the House of Commons and the Welsh Parliament. In 2014 he was awarded a Travelling Fellowship to visit New York, Texas and California to research alternatives to imprisonment.
Rob is a member of the Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice and the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control.
Professor Kevin Haines is a Visiting Professor of Youth Justice Policy and Practice.
He is a member of the European Council for Juvenile Justice and a former member of the Welsh Youth Justice Advisory Panel, YJB Cymru's Practice Development Panel the YJB's Classification Panel and the Howard League's Research Advisory Group.
Kevin's research focuses on putting the child back into youth justice. This can be traced back to his book (with Mark Drakeford) 'Young People and Youth Justice' (1998), through 'Understanding Youth Offending: Risk Factor Research, Policy and Practice' (2009 with Stephen Case), to his current book (with Stephen Case) 'Positive Youth Justice: Children First, Offenders Second' and over 40 related articles and book chapters.
Professor Haines was a joint winner of the Howard League's Research Medal in 2013 for his work on the Bureau model of diversion from the youth justice system, now adopted across Wales.
Brian Heath, MBE, is a Visiting Fellow of Probation Policy and Practice.
Brian is the former Chief Probation Officer of the Jersey Probation and After Care Service.
Dusty Kennedy is a Visiting Fellow of Youth Justice Policy and Practice.
Dusty began working with young people as a volunteer mentor and detached youth worker, followed by 18 years experience working in the youth justice system as a practitioner and manager.
Before this he spent three years as Welsh Government Head of Youth Justice Strategy.
Professor Peter Raynor is a Visiting Professor of Probation Policy and Practice.
Peter is a former probation officer and qualified social worker.
Much of his research has concerned the evidence base for effective probation practice. He has carried out research on victims of crime, drug and alcohol services, young offenders, social work education, unemployed young people, intensive probation, and the relationship between rehabilitation and justice and a range of other criminal justice topics.